[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New Sieve extension "refuse" proposal - draft-elvey-refuse-sieve-01h

2004-02-13 12:38:52

Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:

Matthew Elvey (FM) writes:

I suggest adding a sentence saying that SMTP refusal may happen at the RCPT TO or DATA stages, depending on what's convenient to the implementation. (I suppose it might also happen at the MAIL FROM stage, if a systemwide sieve does the refusal.)

The 550 result code is a fine thing, but shouldn't you also specify an extended result code (1893/2034)? 5.7.1, perhaps?

This is an open issue in the document ;-). Matthew and I weren't sure what to do with enhanced status codes. Do you suggest that we mandate 5.7.1 or should we instead mention it and allow an MTA to select another enhanced status code if appropriate?

Isode Limited,

IETF standard related pages:

Personal Home Page:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>