Re: Responses to comments on draft-ietf-sieve-editheader-00.txt

Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:

> Philip Guenther writes:
>
> > Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> >
> > > Another minor point: If a message is rejected after being modified, 
> > > which version of the message should be sent to the bounce address, 
> > > the original message or the one with a modified header?
> >
> > The one with the modified header. This was covered by the "Actions 
> > that create messages..." sentence in section 5, which I'm changing to 
> > the "Actions that store or send the message..." sentence mentioned 
> > above.
>
> Fine with me.
>
> Please note specifically that addheader/refuse won't use the modified 
> message, though. (Yes, I realize that for all known current 
> implementations, addheader/refuse isn't possible in the first place.)
The text in -01 effectively says that "reject" should use the modified 
message. How is "refuse" different? If "refuse" uses an SMTP/LMTP 
response, than there is no message?
> It could be (I don't know, nor really care) that you should mention 
> that addheader/reject in that order could expose information 
> unintended, so users should be careful where appropriate.