On 5/12/05 5:05 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen sent forth electrons to convey:
Alexey Melnikov writes:
The text in -01 effectively says that "reject" should use the
modified message. How is "refuse" different? If "refuse" uses an
SMTP/LMTP response, than there is no message?
Exactly.
Arnt
Or as I wrote on 5/9 in the latest revision of draft-ietf-sieve-refuse I
sent Alexey:
Any action that would modify the message body will necessarily have no
effect on the body of any message refused by "refuse" using the 550
SMTP response code.
Since it now defines reject too, perhaps draft-ietf-sieve-refuse is the
wrong name... Let's go with draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-and-reject.