DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed

ietf-mxcomp

DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed

2004-08-24 07:35:17


Despite the 23rd August deadline, the full IPR claims on Sender-ID
have not been disclosed. The licence terms have been disclosed, but
insufficient (almost no) information has been given on what the
claimed IPR covers.

It is not possible for me to deploy Sender-ID without knowing what is
covered by the claimed IPR. Therefore, I suggest that Sender-ID be
abandoned and an alternative - such as SPF - be submitted instead.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Graham Murray <= Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Andrew Newton Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Ryan Ordway Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Graham Murray Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Koen Martens Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Andrew Newton Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Koen Martens Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Mark Lentczner Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Mark C. Langston Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Stephane Bortzmeyer RE: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Previous by Date:	RE: DEPLOY: Microsoft Royalty Free Sender ID Patent License, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Next by Date:	Re: TECH-OMISSION: failure action is too restrictive in -core, Steven G. Willis
Previous by Thread:	DEPLOY: Legal liability for creating bounces from forged messages, Chris Haynes
Next by Thread:	Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Andrew Newton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]