Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed

ietf-mxcomp

2004-08-24 11:05:00



On Aug 24, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Graham Murray wrote:

The licence terms have been disclosed, but
insufficient (almost no) information has been given on what the
claimed IPR covers.


Please reread:
http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/msg03495.html

-andy

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Graham Murray Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Andrew Newton <= Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Ryan Ordway Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Graham Murray Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Koen Martens Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Andrew Newton Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Koen Martens Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Mark Lentczner Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Mark C. Langston Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Stephane Bortzmeyer RE: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, terry

Previous by Date:	RE: DEPLOY: Legal liability for creating bounces from forged messages, terry
Next by Date:	RE: DEPLOY: Microsoft Royalty Free Sender ID Patent License, terry
Previous by Thread:	DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Graham Murray
Next by Thread:	Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Ryan Ordway
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]