Re: on the topic of IPR



On Aug 27, 2004, at 1:16 PM, Paul Iadonisi wrote:

I'm also boggled that you are endorsing the kind of vagueness that
many of us are trying to get some clarification on.

I am not endorsing anything. Please reread the very first paragraph ofmy message.


-andy

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: on the topic of IPR, (continued) Re: on the topic of IPR, Kevin Peuhkurinen Re: on the topic of IPR, Michel Bouissou Re: on the topic of IPR, Andrew Newton Re: on the topic of IPR, Kevin Peuhkurinen Re: on the topic of IPR, David H. Lynch Jr. Re: on the topic of IPR, Andrew Newton Re: on the topic of IPR, Yakov Shafranovich Re: on the topic of IPR, Andrew Newton Re: on the topic of IPR, Dave Crocker Re: on the topic of IPR, Paul Iadonisi Re: on the topic of IPR, Andrew Newton <= Re: on the topic of IPR, Paul Iadonisi Re: on the topic of IPR, Andrew Newton RE: on the topic of IPR, Scott Kitterman Re: on the topic of IPR, George Mitchell Re: on the topic of IPR, David H. Lynch Jr. Re: on the topic of IPR, Greg Connor RE: on the topic of IPR, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: on the topic of IPR, Markus Stumpf Re: on the topic of IPR, kent crispin Re: on the topic of IPR, Kevin Peuhkurinen