Re: Unencumbered Checking


Graham Murray <graham(_at_)webwayone(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> writes:

We should be concerned about what may or may not be done or
implemented in MUAs.


Oooops That should say "We should not be concerned....."
                                  ^^^

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Unencumbered Checking (was Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier), Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Re: Unencumbered Checking (was Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier), David H. Lynch Jr. Re: Unencumbered Checking (was Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier), wayne Re: Unencumbered Checking (was Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier), Markus Stumpf Re: Unencumbered Checking (was Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier), Paul Iadonisi Re: Unencumbered Checking (was Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier), Yakov Shafranovich RE: Unencumbered Checking (was Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID supportin Courier), terry Re: Unencumbered Checking (was Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID supportin Courier), Yakov Shafranovich Re: Unencumbered Checking, Graham Murray Re: Unencumbered Checking, Graham Murray <= Re: Unencumbered Checking, Yakov Shafranovich RE: Unencumbered Checking, terry Re: Unencumbered Checking, Yakov Shafranovich Re: Unencumbered Checking, Markus Stumpf Re: Unencumbered Checking (was Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID supportin Courier), william(at)elan.net Re: Unencumbered Checking (was Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier), Markus Stumpf Re: Unencumbered Checking (was Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier), Yakov Shafranovich Re: Unencumbered Checking (was Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier), Markus Stumpf