Re: In support of Sender ID



Could we perhaps dispense with the corporate (particularly executive)
endorsement posts for Sender-ID?  I thought people in the IETF
represented themselves.  The few times I've seen products 
mentioned, it was by the /developers/ of said products.

-- 
Mark C. Langston            GOSSiP Project          Sr. Unix SysAdmin
mark(_at_)bitshift(_dot_)org   http://sufficiently-advanced.net    
mark(_at_)seti(_dot_)org
Systems & Network Admin      Distributed               SETI Institute
http://bitshift.org       E-mail Reputation       http://www.seti.org

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
In support of Sender ID, Leon Rishniw Re: In support of Sender ID, Mark C. Langston <= RE: In support of Sender ID, Ryan Malayter Re: In support of Sender ID, Mark C. Langston Re: In support of Sender ID, Daniel Senie Re: In support of Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich Re: In support of Sender ID, Mark C. Langston RE: In support of Sender ID, Ryan Malayter Re: In support of Sender ID, Mark C. Langston RE: In support of Sender ID, Ryan Malayter RE: In support of Sender ID, Leon Rishniw Re: In support of Sender ID, Mark C. Langston