On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 01:08:07PM -0500, Ryan Malayter wrote:
[Mark C. Langston]
US corporate law not withstanding, Cloudmark is not an individual.
I submit that the From address of the message in question was "Leon
Rishniw". As you say, we are supposed to assume we all represent
ourselves as individuals here.
So to me, that message says "Leon Rishniw supports SenderID because
Cloudmark organizationally supports it." That's his opinion, and I think
he's just as entitled to express it as you are entitled to express
yours.
So you'll be okay with all those people speaking up for their
organizations, stating that their organizations won't be implementing
it?
Fair enough. The SETI Institute won't be implementing Sender-ID.
--
Mark C. Langston GOSSiP Project Sr. Unix SysAdmin
mark(_at_)bitshift(_dot_)org http://sufficiently-advanced.net
mark(_at_)seti(_dot_)org
Systems & Network Admin Distributed SETI Institute
http://bitshift.org E-mail Reputation http://www.seti.org