Ryan Malayter wrote:
[Mark C. Langston]
Could we perhaps dispense with the corporate (particularly executive)
endorsement posts for Sender-ID? I thought people in the IETF
represented themselves. The few times I've seen products
mentioned, it was by the /developers/ of said products.
We are all posting as individuals, except perhaps for "AccuSpam", which
seems to be both a company and a person. If someone supports their
organization's position on the Sender ID proposal, it is a somehow less
valid endorsement? Even if they - horror of horrors - support SenderID
as an individual BECAUSE their organization supports it?
Obviously, you've got your knickers in a twist because these posters
disagree with you. These posters are not violating any of the rules of
this forum, as far as I can tell.
They are providing information on potential deployment. I find that
information valuable.
Also, lets not lose sight of the fact that all these various people and
companies are actually agreeing to deploy Sender-ID. That is a big
accomplishment for something that isn't even a standard yet.
Yakov