Andrew Newton <andy(_at_)hxr(_dot_)us> writes:
[...]
ver-scope = "pra" / "mailfrom" / name
[...]
The question before the working group: assuming no technical errors
with the above, is there anybody who vehemently objects with this
proposal?
If patent-encumbered stuff (PRA) is any part of the specification (and I
see it mentioned in your proposal), then the ASF (including the
SpamAssassin and JAMES projects) vehemently objects.
Given that there is a lack of consensus on PRA, it seems like the best
course is drop PRA entirely and allow the specification authors to
revise things a bit more freely again.
Daniel Quinlan
V.P., Apache SpamAssassin
--
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/