ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: DEPLOY: Permitting '-all' to be used immediately representsaflag day.

2004-09-15 09:40:57

terry(_at_)ashtonwoodshomes(_dot_)com wrote:

You do not understand the problem. The difficulty with
forwarding occurs at the receiving sites, not the sending
sites that publish Sender-ID records.

There is no such thing as a "receiving site" here. Or rather, the term is used rather misguidedly to denote a site who forwards. If I send mail to a 'receiving' site, which forwards that mail, then that site is simply another hop in the sender chain.

If you use -all you must never send email to an
alias-fowarding address -- but you have no way
of knowing which addresses these are.

This 'problem' is hardly new; it is covered in section "Does SPF break email forwarding?" in the SPF FAQ, at:

http://spf.pobox.com/faq-old.html

The answer is given there, too. Worth quoting is this one:

If you don't have procmail, the .forward could instead just say "|/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f nobody(_at_)intermediate-domain(_dot_)com foo(_at_)bar(_dot_)com"

Professional forwarders should implement SRS. It does not suffice for them to be SPF compliant on the receiving end, yet to omit implementing the necessary rewriting scheme (or use SUBMITTER, once it comes into fashion) on the sending part of the equation.

- Mark

       System Administrator Asarian-host.org

---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>