Re: HELO and Unified

ietf-mxcomp

2004-09-15 16:17:33


Matthew Elvey wrote:

we have been asked by the DNS people to refrain from putting
additional load on the PTR system if possible.

Oh, I missed that request.  A pointer and/or quote would be
appreciated if it wasn't made on this list.


<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.mxcomp/2707/match=apnic>

                          Bye, Frank

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: HELO and Unified, (continued) Re: HELO and Unified, Andrew Newton Re: HELO and Unified, Tony Finch Re: HELO and Unified, Meng Weng Wong Re: HELO and Unified, Jim Fenton Re: HELO and Unified, william(at)elan.net Re: HELO and Unified, Andrew Newton Re: HELO and Unified, Tony Finch Re: HELO and Unified, Douglas Otis Re: HELO and Unified, Daniel Quinlan Re: HELO and Unified, Matthew Elvey Re: HELO and Unified, Frank Ellermann <= ANNOUNCE: I-D draft-ietf-marid-SPF3-00, etc., Matthew Elvey Re: ANNOUNCE: I-D draft-ietf-marid-SPF3-00, etc., Douglas Otis SPF Archive?, Re: ANNOUNCE: I-D draft-ietf-marid-SPF3-00, etc., Matthew Elvey Re: HELO and Unified, william(at)elan.net Re: MTAMARK and RFC 2317, was Re: HELO and Unified, Tony Finch Re: MTAMARK and RFC 2317, was Re: HELO and Unified, william(at)elan.net

Previous by Date:	Re: DEPLOY: Permitting '-all' to be used immediately represents a flag day., Douglas Otis
Next by Date:	Re: Interpreting "v=spf1", Frank Ellermann
Previous by Thread:	Re: HELO and Unified, Matthew Elvey
Next by Thread:	ANNOUNCE: I-D draft-ietf-marid-SPF3-00, etc., Matthew Elvey
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]