-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Saturday 24 April 2004 18.59, Len Sassaman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Jon Callas wrote:
I don't hear a consensus for putting this in. If other people want
to use notations for an ad-hoc implementation, great.
Okay. Then in the interest of achieving a consensus on this matter, I
hereby retract my suggestion that the OpenPGP/MIME preference be
expressed in the notation data field, and endorse David's proposal
that we add an additional subpacket flag. Are other backers of the
notation-data proposal willing to do the same? Please speak up.
As I my role here is that of interested bystander and as I won't be the
one to implement any of the proposed solutions, I say it's up to the
people really working with this stuff.
- -- vbi
Could this mail be a fake? (Answer: No! - http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/intro)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----