Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME"
2004-04-22 12:12:00
I disagree with where this is going.
The point of having notations is so that someone can put data into a
signature without having to have it be part of the standard -- without
having to get a consensus on it.
If we put this in the standard, but define it to be a notation of
"rfc3156":{y|n} (or some other syntax) then we've done exactly what
David proposed, but improved his proposal by making it bigger and
harder to parse.
If the answer to the proposal is "put it in a notation" then to me that
is implicitly saying it should not be part of the standard; it should
be handled in an ad-hoc manner. That's a fine answer. If the answer to
the proposal is that it should be in the standard, than a syntax like
David's is the correct way.
I don't hear a consensus for putting this in. If other people want to
use notations for an ad-hoc implementation, great.
Jon
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", (continued)
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Will Price
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Ian Grigg
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Ian Grigg
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Jon Callas
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", David Shaw
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Jon Callas <=
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Len Sassaman
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Brian G. Peterson
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Len Sassaman
Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", Len Sassaman
Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME", David Shaw
|
|
|