IETF SMTP (date)

March 31, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:53

March 30, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Valdis . Kletnieks, 23:29
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Martin J. Dürst, 07:34

March 29, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, John C Klensin, 15:14
[ietf-smtp] MTN Irancell, mostafa shahdadi, 14:49
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Sean Leonard, 14:05
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Sean Leonard, 13:40
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Sean Leonard, 12:42
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, John Levine, 12:27
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, John C Klensin, 11:34
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Dale R. Worley, 10:45

March 28, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Murray S. Kucherawy, 19:57
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Sean Leonard, 19:20
Re: [ietf-smtp] New proposal: SMTP Strict Transport Security (off-topic), S Moonesamy, 11:47
Re: [ietf-smtp] New proposal: SMTP Strict Transport Security, Mark Risher, 10:12
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, John C Klensin, 08:19
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:41

March 25, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] New proposal: SMTP Strict Transport Security, S Moonesamy, 17:55

March 23, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Dale R. Worley, 21:00
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Ted Lemon, 16:33
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dispatch] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Sean Leonard, 16:26

March 22, 2016

[ietf-smtp] BCP proposal: regular expressions for Internet Mail identifiers, Sean Leonard, 17:53
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] key identities, why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, John R Levine, 15:44
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] key identities, why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, Miller, Timothy J., 13:44
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, Miller, Timothy J., 13:30
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] key identities, why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, John R Levine, 11:18
Re: [ietf-smtp] New proposal: SMTP Strict Transport Security, Daniel Margolis, 11:16
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, Wei Chuang, 09:22
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, Miller, Timothy J., 07:41

March 21, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] New proposal: SMTP Strict Transport Security, Franck Martin, 17:13
Re: [ietf-smtp] New proposal: SMTP Strict Transport Security, David Schweikert, 15:12
Re: [ietf-smtp] New proposal: SMTP Strict Transport Security, Daniel Margolis, 12:40
Re: [ietf-smtp] New proposal: SMTP Strict Transport Security, Daniel Margolis, 12:27
Re: [ietf-smtp] New proposal: SMTP Strict Transport Security, David Schweikert, 12:15
Re: [ietf-smtp] New proposal: SMTP Strict Transport Security, David Schweikert, 11:50

March 20, 2016

[ietf-smtp] New proposal: SMTP Strict Transport Security, Mark Risher, 20:45
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, John R Levine, 18:10

March 16, 2016

Re: [smime] [ietf-smtp] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, Wei Chuang, 09:45

March 15, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, Jim Schaad, 20:35
Re: [ietf-smtp] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, John R Levine, 18:42
Re: [ietf-smtp] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, John R Levine, 18:28
Re: [smime] [ietf-smtp] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, Wei Chuang, 17:37
Re: [ietf-smtp] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, Wei Chuang, 17:30

March 14, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, John R Levine, 15:41
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, Miller, Timothy J., 15:00
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, John R Levine, 11:35
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, Miller, Timothy J., 08:50

March 13, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] another attempt to canonicalize local parts, John R Levine, 15:18
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] another attempt to canonicalize local parts, John C Klensin, 12:44
Re: [ietf-smtp] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, Wei Chuang, 10:58
Re: [ietf-smtp] e2e email security (Was: Re: [pkix] another attempt to canonicalize local parts), John R Levine, 10:26

March 12, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] e2e email security (Was: Re: [pkix] another attempt to canonicalize local parts), John C Klensin, 08:16
[ietf-smtp] e2e email security (Was: Re: [pkix] another attempt to canonicalize local parts), Stephen Farrell, 05:30
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] another attempt to canonicalize local parts, John R Levine, 03:46

March 11, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] another attempt to canonicalize local parts, John C Klensin, 18:57
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] another attempt to canonicalize local parts, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 15:37
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] another attempt to canonicalize local parts, John C Klensin, 14:45
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] another attempt to canonicalize local parts, Martin Rex, 13:11
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dane] "decoded local-part" for dane-smime and dane-openpgp, Paul Wouters, 13:11
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dane] "decoded local-part" for dane-smime and dane-openpgp, Sean Leonard, 07:03
Re: [ietf-smtp] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, Richard Clayton, 06:03

March 10, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts, John R Levine, 16:01
Re: [ietf-smtp] another attempt to canonicalize local parts, Wei Chuang, 13:00
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] another attempt to canonicalize local parts, John R Levine, 07:09
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] another attempt to canonicalize local parts, Eliot Lear, 07:08
Re: [ietf-smtp] another attempt to canonicalize local parts, John R Levine, 04:28
Re: [ietf-smtp] another attempt to canonicalize local parts, Wei Chuang, 03:39
Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] [dane] Request DANE ALPS (another attempt to canonicalize local parts), Wei Chuang, 02:59

March 09, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] [pkix] [dane] Request DANE ALPS (another attempt to canonicalize local parts), Russ Housley, 18:12
[ietf-smtp] "decoded local-part" for dane-smime and dane-openpgp, Sean Leonard, 17:53
Re: [ietf-smtp] another attempt to canonicalize local parts, John R Levine, 17:08
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dane] Request DANE ALPS (another attempt to canonicalize local parts), Wei Chuang, 16:31
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dane] Request DANE ALPS (another attempt to canonicalize local parts), Wei Chuang, 16:21
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dane] Request DANE ALPS (another attempt to canonicalize local parts), John C Klensin, 15:20
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dane] Request DANE ALPS (another attempt to canonicalize local parts), John R Levine, 14:46

March 08, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] Discussion of draft-storey-smtp-client-id-01, Alexey Melnikov, 11:16
Re: [ietf-smtp] [dane] Request DANE ALPS (another attempt to canonicalize local parts), John R Levine, 02:32

March 06, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] Discussion of draft-storey-smtp-client-id-01, Michael Peddemors, 11:13

March 02, 2016

Re: [ietf-smtp] Discussion of draft-storey-smtp-client-id-01, Brandon Long, 19:04