ietf-smtp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-smtp] why are we reinventing mta-sts ?

2019-10-07 15:38:32

If you can figure out a backward compatible way for authoritative DNS
servers to signal that they support DoT without a lot of performance loss
(e.g., a failed probe to port 853 on every query to a non-DoT server), a
lot of people over in dnsop would like to hear about it.


How about adding a prefix or label just like our solution for the
authoritative DNS servers that support DoT?

ns1.example.com  =>  dot-ns1.example.com OR _dot.ns1.example.com

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 12:38 AM John R Levine <johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, Keith Moore wrote:
There's been some discussion about how an authoritative server
might signal that it accepts DoT but it hasn't gotten very far.

Well, maybe this use case will provide an incentive for someone to do
the remaining work.

If you can figure out a backward compatible way for authoritative DNS
servers to signal that they support DoT without a lot of performance loss
(e.g., a failed probe to port 853 on every query to a non-DoT server), a
lot of people over in dnsop would like to hear about it.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp



-- 
Best Regards,

Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
Dombox, Inc.
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>