Hi there.
A little while ago I sent the list a message with a complete replacement
paragraph for a paragraph in the delivered-to draft. As I said, let's
see if we have consensus from the rest of the WG.
It looks like you're losing messages so you might want to see why they're
going astray and catch up from the mail archive or IMAP server.
R's,
John
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 2/17/2021 3:31 PM, John R Levine wrote:
I provided language. Let's see if we have consensus from the rest of the
WG.
John,
I've reviewed your postings and do not find any definition of 'trace header
field'. So there's nothing for the working group to consider.
Again, you appear to be insisting on inclusion of a term that has no
consensus definition -- nevermind one that has been published -- and no
operational effect on the draft. (It's also not a wg draft.)
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp