Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated?

In message <200005080110(_dot_)SAA22920(_at_)boreas(_dot_)isi(_dot_)edu>, Bill 
Manning writes:
> Sigh,
>       Please -NOT- the PIARA again. There is near zero value in the
> number/address 
Right.  That's why, following the publication of RFC 1631, everyone gave up on 
NATs as a bad idea, and no one is selling them.  We all have all the addresses 
we want, so why bother translating?


                --Steve Bellovin