Re: Need to preserve Internet Drafts2000-09-28 14:50:02Eric Brunner-Williams wrote: [..] WGs are not procedurally necessary for a draft to reach publication, So we add "and/or IESG" to the list of IETF/IRTF organs who might be interested in an I-D, that's not much of a stretch. After 6 months and no re-issue an I-D can be considered to be of no interest to WGs or the IESG. That's all the warning about 'validity' needs to convey to interested parties who may be perusing a real or hypothetical archive of I-Ds. cheers, gja
|
|