So we add "and/or IESG" to the list ...
Um, they don't have a monopoly on omnicience, to approxi-quote Fred, and
cannot be an exhaustive remedy for WG and I-ID expiry. If they were, then
I wouldn't be writing draft-brunner-iesg-http-cookies-wrong-00.txt.
Incidently, this arises out of the expired draft + defunct WG case which
I originally posed. An informational RFC with the catchy title "RFC xxxx
(BCP) Considered Harmful" ought to happen once in a while, as RFC means
"request for comments". I'd prefer not to be its author, but some things
are more awkward to go around.
Anyway, I only mention this to point out that WG-Centric doesn't make a
compelling answer, and adding jrandom body of experts isn't as compelling
as just getting it right, even if individually.
Cheers,
Eric