RE: NATs *ARE* evil!

How does the idea of NAT destroy the global Internet address space?  

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 4:05 AM
To: M Dev
Cc: Sean Doran; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; iab(_at_)iab(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: NATs *ARE* evil! 

the problems with NAT are not generally due to implementation.
they are inherent in the very idea of NAT, which destroys the
global Internet address space.

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, (continued)* Message not available *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Geoff Huston* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, David W. Morris* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Frank Solensky* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Brian E Carpenter* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Frank Solensky* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Brian E Carpenter* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Fred Baker* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Fred Baker* *RE: NATs ARE* evil!*, Iliff, Tina* *RE: NATs ARE* evil!*, Dave Robinson* <= *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Scott Brim* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Valdis . Kletnieks* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, chris d koeberle* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Melinda Shore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Michael Richardson* *RE: NATs ARE* evil!*, Dave Robinson* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore*

Previous by Date:	Re: What is the IETF? -- A note of caution, Gabriel Landowski
Next by Date:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore*
Previous by Thread:	*RE: NATs ARE* evil!*, Iliff, Tina*
Next by Thread:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore*
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]