Re: NATs *ARE* evil!

How does the idea of NAT destroy the global Internet address space?


because in a NATted network the same addresses are used in different
parts of the network.  addresses are meaningless.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, (continued)* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, David W. Morris* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Frank Solensky* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Brian E Carpenter* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Frank Solensky* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Brian E Carpenter* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Fred Baker* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Fred Baker* *RE: NATs ARE* evil!*, Iliff, Tina* *RE: NATs ARE* evil!*, Dave Robinson* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* <= *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Scott Brim* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Valdis . Kletnieks* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, chris d koeberle* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Melinda Shore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Michael Richardson* *RE: NATs ARE* evil!*, Dave Robinson* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Stephen Sprunk*

Previous by Date:	*RE: NATs ARE* evil!*, Dave Robinson*
Next by Date:	Re: Congestion control, Scott Brim
Previous by Thread:	*RE: NATs ARE* evil!*, Dave Robinson*
Next by Thread:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Scott Brim*
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]