Re: Congestion control

I find it amusing that this debate on how to handle "congestion" at IETFmeetings mirrors the technical debate on congestion in the Internet. Thetwo sides still seem to be "more bandwidth" or "apply QOS".

Bob

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Congestion control, (continued) Re: Congestion control, Fred Baker Message not available Re: Congestion control, Harald Alvestrand Message not available Re: Congestion control, Fred Baker Re: Congestion control, Henning G. Schulzrinne Re: Congestion control, Grenville Armitage Re: Congestion control, Tripp Lilley Re: Congestion control, John Collis Re: Congestion control, Dave Crocker Re: Congestion control, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: Congestion control, Dave Crocker Re: Congestion control, Bob Hinden <= Re: Congestion control, Grenville Armitage Re: Congestion control, Fred Baker Re: Congestion control, Maurizio Codogno Re: Congestion control, Gabriel Landowski Re: Congestion control, Keith Moore Re: Congestion control, Ole J. Jacobsen Re: Congestion control, Gabriel Landowski

Previous by Date:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Theodore Y. Ts'o*
Next by Date:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Geoff Huston*
Previous by Thread:	Re: Congestion control, Dave Crocker
Next by Thread:	Re: Congestion control, Grenville Armitage
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]