Re: Why XML is perferable

  *> well-known, but some RFCs such as those on OSPF may be much
  *> more vivid if written in XML. There have been quite a few


Vivid?  We are talking about deeply complex technical documents
here, not MTV.  What do you mean, "vivid"?

Bob Braden

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Why XML is perferable, (continued) Re: Why XML is perferable, Wang Xianzhu Re: Why XML is perferable, Jorge Amodio Re: Why XML is perferable, Jun'an Gao Re: Why XML is perferable, Jun'an Gao Re: Why XML is perferable, Valdis . Kletnieks Why XML is perferable, Wang Xianzhu RE: Why XML is perferable, graham . travers Re: Why XML is perferable, Jon Crowcroft RE: Why XML is perferable, graham . travers RE: Why XML is perferable, Shaw, Robert Re: Why XML is perferable, Bob Braden <= Re: Why XML is perferable, Jun'an Gao Re: Why XML is perferable, Sean Finn Re: Why XML is perferable, Harald Alvestrand Re: Why XML is perferable, Bob Braden Re: Why XML is perferable, Stephen McHenry Re: Why XML is perferable, Jon Crowcroft Re: Why XML is perferable, John Stracke Message not available Re: Why XML is perferable, Eliot Lear Re: Why XML is perferable, Scott Brim Re: Why XML is perferable, Stephen McHenry

Previous by Date:	RE: HTML better for small PDAs, Doug Sauder
Next by Date:	Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Valdis . Kletnieks
Previous by Thread:	RE: Why XML is perferable, Shaw, Robert
Next by Thread:	Re: Why XML is perferable, Jun'an Gao
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]