The economy was probably at least as big a deterrent as the weather.
That's one deterrent I wold rather not have as a permanent feature :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf_censored(_at_)beatles(_dot_)cselt(_dot_)it
[mailto:owner-ietf_censored(_at_)beatles(_dot_)cselt(_dot_)it] On Behalf Of
RJ Atkinson
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 6:26 PM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Kudos to MSP IETF hosts & other ramblings
At 12:52 22/03/01, William Allen Simpson wrote:
This is a rare case where I disagree with Phil. This is a good
location. Unfortunately, it wasn't cold enough to discourage the
usual gaggle of folks that haven't read the charter or the drafts....
I thought the host folk and hotel did a fine job
overall. I encourage IETF visiting cold climates during the
local winter
and hot steamy climates during local summer. For example,
next time we do Oslo or Stockholm, maybe we could do so in winter.
I did think that the percentage of attendees who
seemed genuinely interested and engaged in technical
discussion during WG meetings was much higher than in San
Diego. Also, I was able to attend WG meetings that I tried
to attend in Minneapolis, whereas I got into zero of the WG
meetings I tried to attend in San Diego.
Ran
-
This message was passed through
ietf_censored(_at_)beatles(_dot_)cselt(_dot_)it, which is a sublist of
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org(_dot_) Not all messages are passed. Decisions on
what
to pass are made solely by Maurizio Codogno.