----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>
To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3(_at_)torque(_dot_)pothole(_dot_)com>
Cc: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: networksorcery.com spam
At 10:07 AM 7/22/2001, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote:
clearly 99.9% of spam is worse than the networksorcery
stuff. I suggest that stopping the worst of the spam should be higher
priority.
an excellent goal. how can we objectively differentiate the one from the
other?
Simply moving away from the IPv4 Sewer works wonders.
The "toy" IPv4 Internet is a sewer.
IPv8 is designed to be a swamp to cover the sewer.
IPv16 is the "high-ground"....
...here are some links...
http://www.dot-arizona.com/IPv8/
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com
Mars 128n 128e
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12213.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12223.html
