Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root
2002-07-30 21:26:07
Carl Malamud wrote:
Hmmm ... seems like the telephone system has a similar system. You dial 411
and ask for "Malamud(_at_)StewartsPoint" and a human/humanoid answers "Please
choose".
There's certainly room for systems like RealNames and certainly rooms for
other namespaces that handle ambiguity, but the DNS serves a pretty useful
purpose
of resolving domain names to various resource records. Rather than
muck with it, I like Peter's approach of trying to build new services and
keeping the existing one in place.
Please note that the "harris" solutions were presented as meta-systems.
My comments implied no changes whatosever to the DNS. Actually,
my comments denied any changes in the DNS in order to be applied.
If it was otherwise intepreted by anyone, may this msg eliminate the
ambiguity ;-)
BTW, they can also be automated as I commented before.
Cheers,
Ed Gerck
Regards,
Carl
"vinton g. cerf" wrote:
ed,
sorry I asked an ambiguous question!
your answer worked for the case that harris.com was unambiguous.
As below, the answer works when an email address returns ambiguous results
-- whatever the cause of that ambiguity.
I was trying to ask what if the "harris.com" part of
"user(_at_)harris(_dot_)com" produced ambiguous results?
In the same way, where both my short and long answers apply. Please note
that you just moved the same problem to a higher node. To exemplify, the
short
answer could be something like:
-----
This is an automatic reply to your request for:
Harris.COM
2 different domain names are named Harris.COM
Please choose which one of the following domain names you
would like to reach, by clicking on the link shown on the right.
Harris Motor Company at Harris.COM
Harris Models at Harris.COM
--------------------------
-
This message was passed through
ietf_censored(_at_)carmen(_dot_)ipv6(_dot_)cselt(_dot_)it, which
is a sublist of ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org(_dot_) Not all messages are passed.
Decisions on what to pass are made solely by Raffaele D'Albenzio.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Trees have one root, (continued)
- Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud
- Re: Trees have one root, Joe Touch
- Re: Trees have one root, Ole J. Jacobsen
- get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Dave Crocker
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, vinton g. cerf
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, vinton g. cerf
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Carl Malamud
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root,
Ed Gerck <=
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, John Stracke
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Peter Deutsch |
Next by Date: |
yokohame iesg plenary ipv6 panel presentations, Randy Bush |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Carl Malamud |
Next by Thread: |
Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Valdis . Kletnieks |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|