On 5/30/03 at 6:24 PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
So far, you haven't sent anything (despite a very impressive resume)
that seems to be relevant experience in tracking abusers.
For some reason, Dean decided to start Cc'ing his private mail
conversation with John to me (I'm not sure exactly why), but because
of that, I was privy to the e-mail in question and can't let the
above statement pass.
Dean's above statement is patently false. John did provide (for
Dean's reference, in message <152050487(_dot_)1054196854(_at_)p3(_dot_)JCK(_dot_)COM>)
absolutely relevant experience in tracking abusers in the mail to
which he refers.
Given the large number of other false statements and invalid
arguments in Dean's messages to this list, both on issues of
substance and with regard to his personal attacks on John, I have
decided not to engage with Dean publicly, though I have sent him
private mail pointing out at least one of his invalid arguments. I
suggest others might also benefit from subjecting Dean's messages to
careful scrutiny; I have found them lacking in factual information
and quite misleading.
pr
--
Pete Resnick <mailto:presnick(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com>
QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102