ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IETF58 - Network Status - 12:05PM Local Time

2003-11-11 14:02:50
So let us hope this year's "58crew" write up the lessons that have been
learnt and make them public for future events :)

Tim
(WLAN has been good in the Salons today, but iffy in the lobby bar, an
incentive to be in the sessions I guess!)

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:42:17AM -0800, Kevin C. Almeroth wrote:
From owner-ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org Tue Nov 11 09:53:18 2003
From: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi(_dot_)palet(_at_)consulintel(_dot_)es>
To: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Subject: Re: IETF58 - Network Status - 12:05PM Local Time
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 10:28:51 -0600
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi(_dot_)palet(_at_)consulintel(_dot_)es
X-Spam-Processed: consulintel.es, Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:29:53 +0100
   (not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-MDRemoteIP: 130.129.135.195
X-Return-Path: jordi(_dot_)palet(_at_)consulintel(_dot_)es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org

Totally agree with your view, sorry if I was too much rude.

But the result is that today the network is working better than never !

But the result is independent of whether people are running in ad hoc
mode...  it has to do with AP tuning, etc.

-Kevin



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>