Re: IETF58 - Network Status

On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:21:59AM -0800, Kevin C. Almeroth wrote:


It might be a good idea to stop comparing Minneapolis to Vienna.  Vienna
had a host and Minneapolis did not.


And a host that did not document what it did for the WLAN provision,
despute requests to do so.

Tim

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: IETF58 - Network Status, (continued) Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Tim Chown Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Joel Jaeggli Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Keith Moore Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Keith Moore Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Clint Chaplin Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Keith Moore Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Clint Chaplin RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) Re: IETF58 - Network Status, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Kevin C. Almeroth Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Tim Chown <= Re: IETF58 - Network Status, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Stig Venaas Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Leif Johansson Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Henrik Levkowetz Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Mark Prior Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Kevin C. Almeroth Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Joel Jaeggli

Previous by Date:	Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Joel Jaeggli
Next by Date:	Re: i18n name badges, John C Klensin
Previous by Thread:	Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Kevin C. Almeroth
Next by Thread:	Re: IETF58 - Network Status, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]