Re: Tag, You're It!

ietf

2003-12-17 10:53:12

At 9:55 AM -0500 12/17/03, John Stracke wrote:

Modifying the Subject: line is a Bad Thing; it invalidates digital signatures.

Which digital signatures are you talking about? Neither S/MIME norOpenPGP sign the headers in messages, only the bodies.


--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: What eMail is legitimate, (continued) Re: What eMail is legitimate, Vernon Schryver Re: What eMail is legitimate, John Leslie Re: Adding SpamAssassin Headers to IETF mail, Dean Anderson Re: Adding SpamAssassin Headers to IETF mail, Jake Nelson Re: Adding SpamAssassin Headers to IETF mail, John Leslie Re: Adding SpamAssassin Headers to IETF mail, Dean Anderson Re: Adding SpamAssassin Headers to IETF mail, Henrik Levkowetz Re: Adding SpamAssassin Headers to IETF mail, Sujit Menon Tag, You're It! (was: Adding SpamAssassin Headers to IETF mail), Dave Aronson Re: Tag, You're It!, John Stracke Re: Tag, You're It!, Paul Hoffman / IMC <= Re: Tag, You're It!, John Stracke Re: Tag, You're It!, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: Tag, You're It!, John Stracke Re: Tag, You're It!, James M Galvin Re: Tag, You're It!, David Morris Re: Tag, You're It!, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: Tag, You're It!, John Stracke Re: Tag, You're It!, Stephen Sprunk Re: Tag, You're It!, Doug Royer

Previous by Date:	Re: More frustrating that not having [ietf] (Fw: Undelivered MailReturned to Sender), Clint Chaplin
Next by Date:	Re: Tag, You're It!, John Stracke
Previous by Thread:	Re: Tag, You're It!, John Stracke
Next by Thread:	Re: Tag, You're It!, John Stracke
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]