Hi -
From: "Fred Templin" <ftemplin(_at_)iprg(_dot_)nokia(_dot_)com>
To: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no>
Cc: "Pekka Savola" <pekkas(_at_)netcore(_dot_)fi>;
<iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>;
<ftemplin(_at_)iprg(_dot_)nokia(_dot_)com>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'The IESG and RFC Editor documents: Procedures' to BCP
...
I have never seen such a statement appearing in an I-D before.
Is this a standard statement for such procedural documents?
And, is the intention that it be removed (by the RFC editor,
I guess) before publishing as BCP?
...
RFC 3667 clause 5.5 says it's required in all IETF documents.
None of the exceptions listed in clause 5.6 would appear to apply.
Randy
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf