ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: 'The IESG and RFC Editor documents: Procedures' to BCP

2004-05-20 19:37:05
Hello Harald,

I had a question on this that may be somewhat related to Pekka's.
On the final page of the document, we find:

Disclaimer of Validity

  This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
  "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
  OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
  ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
  INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
  INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
  WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

I have never seen such a statement appearing in an I-D before.
Is this a standard statement for such procedural documents?
And,  is the intention that it be removed (by the RFC editor,
I guess) before publishing as BCP?

Thanks - Fred
ftemplin(_at_)iprg(_dot_)nokia(_dot_)com

On Fri, 7 May 2004, The IESG wrote:

The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering Group
to consider the following document:

- 'The IESG and RFC Editor documents: Procedures '
  <draft-iesg-rfced-documents-01.txt> as a BCP

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the
iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org or ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 
2004-06-04.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iesg-rfced-documents-01.txt


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>