On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 08:56:15PM +0300, Pekka Savola allegedly wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Scott W Brim wrote:
Is there anything in this message that disagrees with 3668? 3668 is a
little more "nuanced", for example you don't have to disclose until it
looks like your idea is going to be incorporated in something headed
towards standards track, but generally I think what you describe is how
things work now.
Please do NOT spread that kind of total misinformation.
You have to disclose your IPR as soon as reasonably possible when an
internet-draft or RFC potentially infringing on it has been published,
no matter the category it's headed.
True. I was replying in the standards track context.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf