On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I think that a short BCP or the equivalent for jabber scribing
would make sense, as not everyone is familiar with the technology.
As a frequent scribe, I suspect that scribing and jabber could be
combined for open meetings (and might improve the scribing), but
1 minute after the start of the meeting is not the time to start
investigating it.
Scribing on jabber does produce a dependancy on reliable network
transport. The audio encoders and the multicast sources before them live
on their own subnet for a similar reason.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
On Mar 10, 2005, at 2:49 PM, Daniel Senie wrote:
At 12:17 PM 3/10/2005, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
--On 10. mars 2005 07:50 -0800 Joel Jaeggli <joelja(_at_)darkwing(_dot_)uoregon(_dot_)edu>
wrote:
In our draft you'll see that we're pretty explicit in that our goal is to
build a service that is light-weight enough that it can be provided at a
very low cost, and across all the meetings. nothwithstanding any other
infusions of funding or volunteer energy, staying focused on keeping it
light is paramount.
I (seeing this as recommendation to my successors) also think that having
a light, basic service that we know we can afford to provide is a good
starting point for building more extensive services - figure out if
they're worth building, figure out how much they will cost, figure out how
to pay for them and staff them, then build them.
<ietfcast(_at_)lists(_dot_)uoregon(_dot_)edu> is a good place to discuss what the next
steps should be.
I think Joel's done a stellar job of providing this service this time -
thanks a lot, Joel!
As someone who's been beating the drum for remote attendance for some time,
I have to say the audio setup this time was outstanding. I was only able to
listen in on a limited number of sessions, but that was enough for me to
hear the discussion on a draft I'm working on. Video would not have added
anything of value in reality.
Kudos to all involved in setting up this service. Even if other services
are added later, this sets a baseline service level for broadcasting from
the meetings that provides a meaningful way to participate for folks unable
to make it to the meetings.
Dan
P.S. Yes, there's some work to do on providing a way for remote folks to
have their response comments heard. Jabber is fine for that, provided
someone in the WG meeting speaks up to express what's being said on the
channel.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja(_at_)darkwing(_dot_)uoregon(_dot_)edu
GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf