Re: Uneccesary slowness.

Margaret Wasserman wrote:
 
> Are there really a significant number of people who think it
> should be otherwise?
Sometimes an apparently "individual submission" might represent
the views of a "community" which just prefers to be no IETF WG
for its own reasons (e.g. because a WG was closed).  Bye, Frank
-- 
<http://purl.net/xyzzy/home/test/spf-council.htm>



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf