At 5:05 PM -0700 5/18/05, David Kessens wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:08:39PM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
For example, as you note, the IESG approves working groups and working group
charters. So the IESG does, in fact, have the ability to control the later
demand placed on it.
Are you suggesting that we start disapproving new working groups
since they cause work for the IESG ?
Yes! In fact, if I closed down all of those pesky INT area WGs, I
would definitely be able to process those individual submissions on
time! :-)
Seriously, I am operating under the assumption that timely review and
processing of WG charters and WG documents is more important to the
community than timely processing of RFC Editor individual
submissions, and the fact that I do not always manage to process
individual submissions on time reflects that prioritization.
Are there really a significant number of people who think it should
be otherwise?
Margaret
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf