Adam Roach wrote:
Dave Crocker wrote:
(This area is going to take over xmpp, too?)
I don't think it is a useful exercise to go through all the closed
working groups to determine which would have been in RAI had the area
existed when they were still active.
i agree. so it's probably a good thing I didn't.
by the same token it does not make sense to include work that seems to have no
relationship to the various (and varying) stated technical criteria.
Therefore, mentioned parallel work -- whether active or completed -- by way of
demonstrating an implication, did, and does, seem useful.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf