On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
At 15:50 05/12/2005, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Simon,
You are bit behind real time. We already updated this text.
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg01837.html
Dear Brian,
Great! the three stupid points I am stubbornly interested in are
gathered here! Please read what follows with humour, however the
three issues are serious.
<snip>
If I copy all the RFCs, sort their content, add a legal blabla paying
my respects to all those who contributed through the IETF, make an
open use e-book from them all, class their proposition in some
orders, updating it when they change, mixing them with other SSDOs
propositions, etc. translating parts in various languages, adding
comments on their usage cons and pros and testing, linking the
various comments people may have made on them, etc. quoting available
open source/commercial libraries and their variations, etc. and the
various registry repositories where they can find the values of the
related parameters, i.e. what the users long for a while, will the
IAOC sue me and send me to jail as the US DMCA and the French DADVSI would do?
Tounge firmly in cheek:
Of course we won't send you to jail. We'll make you come live in a
country with no real cheese and a lot of overly oak-y white wine.
far worse. ;-)
- lel
thank you
jfc
_______________________________________________
IAOC mailing list
IAOC(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iaoc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf