On Jun 24, 2006, at 8:55 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
That's not quite sufficient, because most WGs aren't proceeding
according to good engineering discipline (e.g. they're doing things
in the wrong order, like trying to define the protocol before the
problem space is understood)
I'd generalize that. I have never seen *any* standards org do a good
job of inventing new technology. I've been working with the soon-to-
wind-down Atompub group for a couple of years and we got a pretty
good result I think (if you can judge by implementations &
deployments). There were a few things in our favor - a high level of
interest and energy, lots of experience on the WG, decent editors -
but the key thing was there was a ton of hands-on experience in the
space (syndication technology). A whole lot of the key arguments
could be resolved by appeal to example and experience.
When standards orgs go out to invent stuff in unexplored territory
you get disasters like OSI networking, CORBA, and in the current
landscape, WS-*. I suppose there are exceptions but I don't know of
any.
-Tim
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf