On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 25-jun-2006, at 6:18, Keith Moore wrote:
Trouble is, in our current process, there's rarely any formal request
for feedback, and little external visibility of a WG's output, until
Last Call.
But I see your point. When I first attended an IETF meeting I was
surprised to see how inward looking wgs are. There is very little, if
any, effort to present what the working group is doing to people outside
of the wg.
I guess that if people are interested in the WG then they will
participate, or at least read the drafts as they come up in the i-d
announcement list. You can't force volunteers to take an interest.
Perhaps requirements documents should be more like rationale documents:
"we chose to solve this problem in this way because of this"...
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
SOUTHEAST ICELAND: SOUTH VEERING SOUTHWEST 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 IN NORTH.
RAIN AT TIMES. MODERATE OR GOOD.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf