Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:26:33 -0500
John C Klensin <john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com> wrote:
Perhaps we should make it a requirement that any document that
is Last Called must be associated with a mailing list, perhaps
one whose duration is limited to the Last Call period and any
follow-ups until the document is either published or finally
rejected. If there were a WG, then the WG list should be a
proper subset of that list, anyone commenting during the Last
Call should be added to it, and others could be added on request.
Actually, I think it's an excellent idea. Tracking Last Call comments
was always difficult, since the email tended to end up in several
different folders and wasn't archived elsewhere.
I have argued for years that an I-D that doesn't say in its "status of
this memo" section which mailing list it is to be discussed on is
incomplete, but I don't seem to have achieved much success for that.
I think all I-Ds should have this - both the first ones and the last ones.
Harald
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf