--On Thursday, 08 February, 2007 03:34 -0500 Jari Arkko
<jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net> wrote:
Thanks for your note John. Let me also emphasize the need for
these two drafts to be synchronized. Last calling draft-iesg
at this time was made in part because we wanted to get the
two in sync. I think we are more or less in sync but the
remaining input should come from the community.
As for the list to use for discussion -- sending mail to the
iesg list only would indeed be one way. The discussion list
we are on right now seems more suited, no?
Sure. But my point in that area was obviously not clear. Prior
to the announcement of the Last Call, there was no indication to
the community that this document should be considered and
discussed, much less where. There is no working group charter,
no history of open discussion, and so on. And _that_ calls for
a four-week Last Call, not two weeks.
regards,
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf