On 2007-02-08 01:25, Frank Ellermann wrote:
John C Klensin wrote:
If the IESG intends this document to merely represent the
particular procedures they intend to follow within the range of
alternatives over which they believe they have discretion, then
it should probably be published as an ION
Not publishing it at all is an alternative. It would send an
unmistakable message to wannabe-authors, that they should use the
"independent" path, unless they're a friend of a friend of an AD.
That is a complete mischaracterization. The intent in publishing
this (and doing so in parallel with draft-klensin-rfc-independent)
is to make it much clearer to authors when they should choose one
path and when they should choose another.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf