Sam Hartman wrote:
In conclusion, I object quite strongly combining message and
interpreter context information. The other comments I'm making are
less serous. However based on the number of comments I think this
document needs significant positive review before it is ready to be
Speaking as the document shepherd: the document received a fair number
of reviews on the Sieve WG mailing list and there is support to progress it.
Some comments raised would require a new revision before the document
goes to IESG review. I will make sure that your comments are either
addressed or answered+argued against by the author of the document.
IETF mailing list