--On March 18, 2008 4:51:42 AM -0400 Sam Hartman
This extension appears to conflate two unrelated things: information
about the interpreter context and information about the message.
I don't think these two sets of information are similar enough that the
same interface should be used to get to both of them.
In particular I believe that the remote-host and remote-ip variables
are inappropriate and should not be standardized.
I believe an applicability statement should be added to the extension
making it clear that this extension is only for interpreter state and
that another extension should be designed for examining information
about the message.
I am confused as to which items you think relate to a message as opposed to
the interpreter state. This extension is supposed to be all about
interpreter state - tests against messages are handled in the SIEVE base
and the other extensions.
IETF mailing list