ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal

2008-04-04 08:08:50
- If there were a database with everyone on file .
- If each person were assigned a permanent identity code .
- If block l(i.e. disconnected) letters were required .
- If persons designated as having legible handwriting wrote everything but 
the signature .

/Kim

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Barry Leiba" <leiba(_at_)watson(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com>
To: "Working Group Chairs" <wgchairs(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; "IETF Discussion" 
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal


Olaf, with a cast on his right hand, says...
There may be reasons to contact participants after a meeting, being able 
to tie
the name to an e-mail might be of value.

I don't know what blue sheets *you* have looked at, but on the ones I've 
seen I'd
say that most of the scrawling looks like you dipped your cast in ink and 
tried
to write your email address with it.  And that you're actually 
left-handed, as
well.

In other words, most of them are pretty illegible, benefitting neither 
spammers
nor those trying to make legitimate contact.

I think it ain't broke.  But, really, je m'en fiche, either way.

Barry

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf 

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>