Hi,
I support this experiment. Why short sessions? Why not longer
sessions?
In my experience, Friday sessions are invaluable for having "working"
sessions rather than status sessions, and Friday sessions have been
preferred in some WGs as a way to get real f2f time for engineering.
David Harrington
dbharrington(_at_)comcast(_dot_)net
ietfdbh(_at_)comcast(_dot_)net
dharrington(_at_)huawei(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of IETF Chair
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 5:33 PM
To: IETF Announcement list
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; iesg(_at_)iesg(_dot_)org
Subject: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF
73
The IESG is considering an experiment for IETF 73 in Minneapolis,
and
we would like community comments before we proceed. Face-to-face
meeting time is very precious, especially with about 120 IETF WGs
competing for meeting slots. Several WGs are not able to get as
much
meeting time as they need to progress their work. As an experiment,
we are considering adding two Friday afternoon one-hour meeting
slots.
The proposed Friday schedule would be:
0900-1130 Morning Session I
1130-1300 Break
1300-1400 Afternoon Session I
1415-1515 Afternoon Session II
Please share your thoughts about this proposed experiment. The
proposed experiment will be discussed on the IETF Didcussion mail
list (ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org).
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf