Paul,
FWIW, this works for me.
One quibble: I would suggest that moderation for spam, drivel,
and duplicates ought to be a reasonable Secretariat (or IAD, or
IAD-assigned) task. If the IETF and IAB chair don't have
better things to do with their time than to moderate this sort
of posting, then I suggest a small committee be formed to start
working on a list, perhaps to report back to the RFC Editor well
before the end of March :-(. In addition, having a volunteer
make those decisions could easily lead to claims of conflict of
interest and we don't want to go there.
john
--On Friday, August 15, 2008 10:15 AM -0700 Paul Hoffman
<paul(_dot_)hoffman(_at_)vpnc(_dot_)org> wrote:
It seems like there is a lot of concern about removals, and
some concern about original publication of spam, drivel, and
duplicate notices. Here is a proposal for a way forward:
1) Original submissions to the IPR repository are moderated,
but only to prevent publication of spam and drivel. If the
moderator (who should probably be a NomCom-appointed person
such as the IETF chair or IAB chair) sees what appears to be a
...
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf